Robin Whittleton

No, imitation really isn’t the sincerest form of flattery

Being a web design company we’re pretty used to the idea that other companies might take a certain amount of inspiration from our work.

Sometimes this is benign and comes down to a single idea: a layout, a structure, an colour scheme, a behaviour. Other times it can be a bit more like direct copying, something we’ve found happening recently too.

We’d like to take this as a compliment of our design skills, but ultimately it’s a dilution of our branding.

Finding your plagiarists

In the last few years reverse image searching has really ramped up. TinEye were the first big service, but I’ve personally had more luck with Google’s image search. Simply choose an image from your site, click on the camera icon in the search box and paste in the URI. You’ll end up with a page like this one that lists all the sites that use that or similar images. That obviously doesn’t work for general styles and doesn’t seem to work for background images, but if you’ve got distinct illustration / photography it’s a useful technique. (Incidentally, this can also find sites praising your work which is worth knowing about regardless of any potential piracy problem.)

For wholesale style lifting sometimes a passive approach can help. If you’ve got a social presence you can often find that people drop you a line to let you know about sites they’ve seen that lift content and design. It’s worth having an active Twitter account, and also keeping an eye out for mentions of your site. For example, I keep a saved search running for kyan.com on Twitter.

Dealing with your plagiarists

First off, pick your targets. If someone has used your grid or a chunk of HTML then be glad your approach has helped someone. We all at some point looked at a website’s source to see how something was done, and it’s this open nature that has allowed the web to flourish.

If the level of copying is somewhat greater (e.g. chunks of illustration or layouts) then you might want to take things further. It’s nearly always worth sending a friendly email or picking up the phone. It’s quite possible that they had the work done for them by a less-than-scrupulous agency, or they might have found some work they liked via an image search and not realised the copyright situation.

If your initial contact doesn’t get anywhere then there are a few ways to progress. If it’s a blatant copy and the offender is in a country with a history of copyright enforcement then you could try the legal route. Threat of this alone has been enough to change people’s minds in the couple of times we’ve had to go this far, and luckily we’ve never had to actually hire a lawyer. Of course, if the offender is in a country with a history of copying this isn’t likely to work. In this situation a naming and shaming (especially if you’re bigger and consequently have more weight with search engines) will usually get their attention: no-one likes the search results for their company name to start with a blog post about their inability to design for themselves.

Finally, if none of these approaches get you anywhere then there is an alternative: redesign your own site! It’s probably due a revisit, and you know you’ve been putting it off. Just be thankful for the added incentive.

Tags: copyright, plagiarism

See more posts

Comments: 8

Jessica Jacob
commented on

I have to agree, I work within a web design company and know that we would be ashamed if we blatantly stole someone else's work because we'd be fuming if anyone stole anything of ours. It's just manners at the end of the day!

But, like my grandma used to say, no idea is an original one and that's something to bear in mind. Fashion trends show this very simply, that tartan tie you were given for Christmas 15 years ago will come back in fashion and be worth more than it was then!

However reasonableness and honesty is always the best tact.

Brendan
commented on

I think lifting styles from another site, while demonstrating a lack of creativity, is fair game. A unique visual style is important for a site, but it's only one aspect of the site experience. The whole look and feel encompasses the content, interactive features, animation, and many other elements beyond the visual style.

However, stealing unique illustrations is a pretty weak move and certainly calls for shaming of the offending site into removing the stolen elements. I was surprised to see how much some of the sites in the Google image match search results completely steal your homepage illustrations without giving any credit!

Gavin
commented on

@brendan I agree when it comes to borrowing styles or elements from other sites and indeed other sources. We are all 'guilty' of being inspired by the great visual world that surrounds us online, kyan.com is not immune from this and in fact we wear our inspirations on our sleeve.

However, what we do object to is when dubious individuals directly lift files, modify them for their own purposes, and then post as their own work. Sure you might download a chunk of HTML or CSS to see how it's been put together, but if all you end up doing is changing a few colours, some words and the odd image and then claim it as your own, then that's not inspiration, it's theft. The illustrations are an obvious example of this, but we're no less protective of our layout and content as a whole.

Matt Hicks
commented on

Wow! Some serious rip offs of your new site cropped up there. Thanks for the image search tip - I have now discovered how many people our using our photographs without permission -> http://bit.ly/z0eAyb Not sure what to do as there are so many violations..

Jonathan Lambert
commented on

Collective trends drive Web design, and fiddling with other people's ideas that helps develop your own sense of creativity. This was the original intent of copyright — not the gak we have to deal with now — that we should be able to have a growing core of common ideas, tools, techniques, etc, for the common good and the growth and education of all. Consider twitter bootstrap — now that there's a popular foundation for many, many sites, we're going to see a lot of clones — it's inevitable. But we accept that, because we as creators also have a profound bias to protect our creations, but relatively little outrage when someone else is getting copied. That's why Open Source is so important, because it replaces creator protectionism with idealism around the concept of greater and common good.

"Ripping off," vs "being inspired by" is a delicate line because of this creator bias. Obviously, it's relatively clear that copying your site completely is a ripoff, and you've had some spectacular examples in the last few days (congrats!). But there are only so many colors, headers, fonts, and layouts.

To drive home the point, and in no way am I serious, if I were brash I could also make the argument that you found inspiration from this one page portfolio: http://themeforest.net/item/me/1677820?WT.ac=category_thumb&WT.seg_1=category_thumb&WT.z_author=MagnaThemes

Look, the nav elements use all caps, and in many ways are the same. Obviously, if I took more time I could find a closer example, but I just grabbed one to make a point. There's only so many ways to make a header, and only so many ways to style the dom.

I actually like it when people start packaging up jquery and .js files of effects, because the innovation wave that happens (which is a form of social innovation) is rapid and that's really what's so cool about the web. That Social Innovation is what drives awesome work, and new ideas. But I also feel the sting when someone steals something I spent more than a small number of days building.

I think recency plays a large part as well, because copying an old site or style is considered respectable, but copying a new one is considered rip. I've talked with several people I consider quite intelligent about these kinds of issues, and none have been able to tell me exactly when that line gets crossed. It's one part social trend, one part whether the creator objects, and some other parts in there for good measure like previous popularity, generation gaps, and the iconic degree of the elements being recycled, etc.

The Web peeps need to find model that defines and allows "sampling" of elements with credit so there's a legit way to point back that isn't a straight up link (source?), which I think in large part is the role Dribbble has sometimes, because very little is original, and a lot of the "hot sites" are obvious enhancements of others that showed up in CSS3 galleries weeks before.

And it's always been this way.

I would encourage more people to deeply consider the point. It's much more complicated than the teams I know usually present it. A straight rip will always be a straight rip, but I'm glad to see this point made "trés elegant." As we move from more closed "ownership businesses" to more and more businesses that share for the common good, we're going to really have a chance to look hard at this question.

Nice post. Really like the new site too. :)

Stein
commented on

Nice post and nice comment Jonathan. There is indeed a thin line between stealing someone's work and being inspired by it. Whenever I'm designing or building a website I can't help but get the feeling that everything already has been done before and that it's so difficult to invent really new creative things. You don't have to reinvent the wheel, but I guess you just have to do what you feel is right. Every professional has a certain decency in my opinion.

Copycat Jones
commented on

You guys should check out the general layout and specifically the footer on http://fffunction.co . Looks like they are UK peeps too!

Robin
commented on

That definitely falls into the ‘inspiration’ category. We actually quite like it!

Add a comment

Note: comments are moderated before publication.

Most Popular

"DO NOT EAT" THROW AWAY

Steven Wake

I have the driest draw here at Kyan towers. You see, I am the proud owner of a Silica Gel collection. There is just something about them which compels me to not throw away the little fellas.

Get on the 'social media' bandwagon

Matt Hamm

‘Social media’ is the new buzz term. Everybody’s doing it, and why? Because it can generate masses amount of traffic to your website, which can easily turn into revenue. It’s really what ‘web 2.0’ is all about.

Website easter egg

Piers Palmer

We decided to have a little fun now that summer is over, combining some design yumminess and behavioural goodness. See if you are up to the challenge! Can you find the indomitable and mighty web geek PROFESSOR WAKE on our website. He’s hiding there somewhere… A littl…

Is imitation really the sincerest form of flattery?

Piers Palmer

A new site has appeared on the wonderful inter-tubes, brought to us by a web design firm in Minnesota – Rocket 55 – that looks remarkably similar to ours. As designers we all stand on the shoulders of giants, borrowing ideas and concepts, using the same typefaces, co…